From: saki
(dlm3@midway.uchicago.edu)
Subject: Re: How
did you become a Beatle fan?
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
In article <01bc9e9e$ab12f920$bda02299@infinia>, Billy Shears <theflyu2@earthlink.net> wrote: >I'm just wondering, but how did everyone here become a Beatle fan? By turning on the transistor radio. :-) And that's where you heard this marvelous new sound. Despite its antecedents, nothing like it had ever been heard. To this day I lack the precise verbal skills to express *just how different* the Beatles sounded to ears used to hearing a lot of previously pretty- darn-good music. Motown was beginning. Surf music was ubiquitous. Spector was in fine fettle. Great songs abounded. But there was no sound, no music, no harmonies woven together with *such* deftness and artistry--except what was done by these new Beatles. Art...maybe that was it. Only the Beatles didn't know they were making art. They just sang and played, and the result to our ears was the audiophonic equivalent of discovering the promised land. You couldn't tell what it was. There were no words for it. Just a blend of voices, smoother than good liquor. An amalgam of instruments, so harmonious that there was no way (and no need!) to pull them apart. Critics tried. They were befuddled by the hysterical response of audiences whose enthusiasm suggested a profound revolution was afoot. But no matter who tried to use words to describe their songs---even the well-meaning William Mann---it was all reduced to naught. The proper reduction was in the vinyl. Spin for satori. The sounds and the lyric spoke the clearest truth. And it was some new truth we heard pouring forth from our radios. We were powerless to resist. We were captured like England had been before us, but more swiftly, more breathlessly. We didn't know what Fleet Street in Britain had already called it. All we heard was the musical rush of a cyclone, and we felt whipped round by its power. The songs did that..."I Want To Hold Your Hand" first, and later in January 1964 *any* song they could find... be it the Beatles backing Tony Sheridan, or off-brand labels from Vee-Jay or Swan or Tollie. And what was *really* amazing was that we had not all quite seen the group that made this revelatory noise. The pictures on the singles were strange, I'll grant you, to music lovers raised on Elvis and all his imitators, all the weak brews who followed him...the Frankies and Bobbys and Rickys and sundry hearthrobs. The Beatles weren't like that. We saw these foreigners as a new code not yet fully parsed. We didn't yet know their charm, their deadly sweet humor, their unexpected innocence. We hadn't quite heard their rare Northern lilt, and some of us who did couldn't decipher it yet. We were being prepared; we were being reeled in. Not by the savvy marketing men at Capitol (whose inflated promotional plans were punctured by the very band they thought needed help) but by the scintillating sounds of the music itelf. Who needed "payola" anymore? That was dead, and illegal besides. Program managers fell in a swoon over the Fabs. Every disc jockey was transformed into the Beatles' exclusive mouthpiece. Each station had a special Beatles expert, the one soul whose voice bathed the ether and told you all about your Boys. He'd share the rush you felt in your heart, he'd race to air Beatle double-plays, triple-plays---whatever it took to show you they were fans like you, reading your desires like a chartwise soulmate. We were all in it together, you see. And we hadn't even seen them *move*. Maybe a flicker of something on the evening news in November 1963, if we'd been lucky. But for most of us the first hint of the new direction was in late December 1963, when their song burst forth like a lusty newborn in the charts. Your finger flicked to the volume control on the radio. You turned it up, the better to hear this curious stream of vocal confluence. Your breath stopped. This was the new world. And it was all in your ear. The chugging guitars; the soaring voices. Could you resist? Not me. I gave up resisting that sound about the third time I heard it, sometime in the waning days of December '63. I've never been sorry for the surrender. Their kinetic seduction was to come. It was at least a month off, planned for a big Sunday night on a staid show that none of us made a habit of watching, but (secretly) all of us planned to peruse once we knew they would be there. That night we saw yet another dimension to the phenomenon that had already won us over. Seeing was believing. Remarkable, isn't it, that they had both ends of the spectrum covered? Just in case the Boys didn't nab you with their voices, they'd captivate you with their simple, irresistible visual presence. But that's a transitory power. After all, when all is said and done, it's the music that will survive, not each and every image of their physical triumph. That's nice, but it's not what makes your heart beat in time to their rhythm. It wasn't the case for any of the musical greats of the past. No one cares now whether Bach had long hair or whether Louis Armstrong's charisma was responsible for his fame. Neither element is the deciding factor in whether music is good or not. The only way you can tell is to open your ears, the way you did the first moment you ever heard the Beatles. And if you listen, you'll hear whatever it was you heard the day the music changed your life. -- -------------------------------------- "She can play my guitar note by note." -------------------------------------- saki (dlm3@midway.uchicago.edu)